Disarm Hezbollah—A ‘Permanent Threat to Israel, America and the West’

June 28, 2024

by: Israel Kasnett ~ JNS

Friday, 28 June 2024 | The drums of war are beating louder on Israel’s border with Lebanon with each passing day and experts say it’s not a question of if but when Israel goes to war with Hezbollah.

Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said during his trip to Washington this week that while Israel could send Lebanon “back to the Stone Age,” it prefers diplomacy to lower tensions with the Iran-backed terror army.

With tens of thousands of Israelis having been evacuated from the north for nearly nine months now and Hezbollah continuing to threaten Israel by launching missiles and drones daily, it is clear that Israel must make a decision soon.

Michael Makovsky, CEO of the Washington-based Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA), told JNS that Israel will first have to decide if it’s had enough and will then need to use ground forces to clear out southern Lebanon up to the Litani River.

He said another scenario could unfold in which Hezbollah stops attacking Israel if the fighting in Gaza subsides, but that seems unlikely at the moment. Meanwhile, Makosky noted, Israel continues to pressure Hezbollah hard, destroying a lot of Hezbollah infrastructure near the border.

In a recent Tablet magazine article, Makovsky wrote that Israel was mistaken in recent years in “mostly focusing on limiting the growth of Hezbollah’s capabilities through a decade-long campaign in Syria.”

Allowing the Hezbollah threat to “metastasize” over the past two decades “appears to have been a colossal strategic blunder, the cost of which could even dwarf that of October 7,” he continued.

He also wrote recently in the Hill that there are two reasons Israel must act decisively now.

The first is that “Israel must ensure its citizens return to their northern homes, both out of obligation and because their displacement undermines the founding promise of the Jewish state: that Jews will be safe to live anywhere within its borders.”

The second reason is that Iran is quickly developing its nuclear program and Israel will be unable to defeat Hezbollah once it moves under an Iranian nuclear umbrella.

At the same time, Makovsky noted that Israel “also has good reasons to wait before escalating against Hezbollah. Not least of these is the urgency of finishing the fight in Gaza and freeing the remaining 116 Israeli hostages.”

(Hamas is currently holding 120 hostages in Gaza, four of whom were taken captive prior to October 7.)

The Problem With UNSC 1701 and UNIFIL

The 2006 Second Lebanon War ended with UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which expanded the mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) and required Hezbollah to withdraw north of the Litani River.

According to Hussain Abdul-Hussain, a research fellow at the non-partisan Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies, “While 1701 did achieve calm and quiet for some time and bought Israel some 15 years of quiet on the border with Lebanon, it has since 2020 become irrelevant.”

“The main problem with 1701 is that it is unverifiable,” he said. “Hezbollah fighters move around in civilian clothing, meshing with noncombatants, which makes verifying their withdrawal north of the Litani impossible,” he explained.

“At best,” he said, “Israel could hope to make sure that arms depots, especially rockets and anti-tank missiles, stay north of the Litani and this would need both Israel destroying these caches and giving UNIFIL enough teeth to enforce the new reality, moving forward.”

Abdul-Hussain explained that UNIFIL’s problem is its mandate.

When UNIFIL was expanded under 1701 in 2006, “the idea was that this army-size force would be able to rein in Hezbollah and ensure the disarmament of Lebanese territory south of the Litani, with the Lebanese military being the only other armed force.”

“The problem,” he said, “was that 1701 was endorsed under Chapter VI of the UN Charter [as opposed to mandatory Chapter VII which overrides local government sovereignty], meaning 1701 does not override Lebanese sovereignty but is implemented with the approval and cooperation of the Lebanese government.”

According to Abdul-Hussain, UNIFIL’s operation was thus made incumbent on getting clearance from the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), which is infiltrated and dominated by Hezbollah.

He noted that Israel did provide UNIFIL with intel on Hezbollah’s arms depots south of the Litani, but UNIFIL could not act without informing the LAF first, which leaked the info to Hezbollah, which then moved the arms before UNIFIL arrived.

When Hezbollah couldn’t move its arms fast enough, it sent “locals” to prevent UNIFIL from reaching the area.

UNIFIL was powerless.

“Israel has tried to amend UNIFIL’s mandate and there have been amendments, but thanks to the French, which almost always take Hezbollah’s side, no serious changes to the UNIFIL mission have been approved at the UN annual renewal,” he said.

Makovsky agreed, noting that UNIFIL has been problematic for Israel for years and nothing will change on that front.

According to Makovsky “UNSCR 1701—and the accompanying US policy of strengthening Lebanese state institutions—became a fig leaf for Iran to boost Hezbollah’s rocket and missile capability on Israel’s border.”

This still leaves Israel with a lack of options in terms of disarming Hezbollah and enabling the residents of Israel’s north to return home.

Disarming Hezbollah “should remain at the heart of the debate and the solution,” Abdul-Hussain said.

“Unfortunately,” Abdul-Hussain continued, “America doesn’t see Lebanon as a problem independent of Iran and because the Biden administration wants to make nice with Tehran, it tiptoes around the main problem: Hezbollah’s illegal militia.”

Washington’s policy on Lebanon since 2008 has been one of crisis management, he added.

What this means is that Israel “must engage Hezbollah in a devastating war every decade to buy itself another decade of quiet,” he said.

Another aspect of the problem with Lebanon is that the US and France are not doing enough to pressure Lebanon, Iran, or even Hezbollah to back down.

According to Abdul-Hussain, the US is managing the crisis and France has interests in Iran, which plays out in Lebanon.

When the US removed sanctions on Iran under former US President Barack Obama, “France got two mega deals: A [US] $25 billion deal between Iran and Airbus and a [US] $5 billion for French Total to develop the Pars 11 energy field in the south,” he noted.

For this reason, he said, “France hopes to curry favor with Iran by playing nice with Hezbollah, hoping that if sanctions are removed one day, these deals would be reactivated.”

Both Abdul-Hussain and Makosky agree that Israel must take action to disarm Hezbollah.

According to Abdul-Hussain, “pretending that Iran, Hezbollah or Hamas would moderate if we integrated them into the world order or the world of finance and business is a myth that should be laid to rest, forever.”

Posted on June 28, 2024

Source: (Excerpt of an article originally published by the Jewish News Syndicate on June 28, 2024. Time-related language has been modified to reflect our republication today. See original article at this link.)

Photo Credit: Rabih Daher/AFP via Getty Images/jns.org